Skip to content
Get in touch
The ModelariumAll Worlds
Choose a different job

Research with sources

What do you need to investigate and verify?

PrivacyNon-sensitive inputsDeploymentHosted service allowedScaleOccasional to moderate volumeLatencyInteractive, not real-timeBudgetBalanced quality and costReliabilityHuman review for consequential output
Refine these assumptions in the Calibration Room

3 candidates. No automatic winner.

These are dated starting points under the disclosed defaults. Evaluate these approaches against your workload.

Quality & reliability

Claude Opus 5

Inside: tool using agent

LifecyclecurrentVerified2026-08-27Evidence1 provider source + RS interpretationStatuscurrent

A capable hosted option for long, evidence-heavy synthesis with tools.

TradeoffStrong model capability does not replace source review and increases cost.

Why?
  • supports research
  • accepts text
  • fits quality-reliability
Go deeper

This approach joins the release claude-opus-5 to the deployment offer anthropic-claude-opus-5-api. The recommendation is dated RS interpretation, not a provider ranking.

Technical details

Modalities: text, image. Access: proprietary. Evidence class: rs-interpretation.

Evaluation plan

  1. Prepare five source packets.
  2. Audit every factual claim and citation.
  3. Score omissions uncertainty and cost.

Speed & cost

Claude Sonnet 5

Inside: tool using agent

LifecyclecurrentVerified2026-08-27Evidence1 provider source + RS interpretationStatuscurrent

A faster hosted option for iterative research briefs.

TradeoffCompare difficult synthesis and source discipline against a quality-first model.

Why?
  • supports research
  • accepts text
  • fits speed-cost
Go deeper

This approach joins the release claude-sonnet-5 to the deployment offer anthropic-claude-sonnet-5-api. The recommendation is dated RS interpretation, not a provider ranking.

Technical details

Modalities: text, image. Access: proprietary. Evidence class: rs-interpretation.

Evaluation plan

  1. Prepare five source packets.
  2. Audit claims and citations.
  3. Record turnaround and review time.

Control & locality

Llama 4 Scout

Inside: tool using agent

LifecyclecurrentVerified2026-08-27Evidence1 provider source + RS interpretationStatuscurrent

A self-hosted multimodal route for source packets that must stay local.

TradeoffYou own tool integration, retrieval quality, updates, and evaluation.

Why?
  • supports research
  • accepts text
  • fits control-locality
Go deeper

This approach joins the release meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Original to the deployment offer meta-llama-4-scout-local. The recommendation is dated RS interpretation, not a provider ranking.

Technical details

Modalities: text, image. Access: open-weight. Evidence class: rs-interpretation.

Evaluation plan

  1. Run the same source packets locally.
  2. Verify citations outside the model.
  3. Measure hardware throughput and maintenance.
See what did not enter this shortlist

No additional approaches were evaluated for this job.