Skip to content
Get in touch
An EU-star shield sits above scales weighing an AI chip against a group of people. A three-tier risk pyramid connects by dashed lines to four workers in different roles.
Reviewed visual · version 1

RS Glossary

EU AI Act

The EU AI Act is a European Union regulation that establishes obligations for AI systems and participants using a risk-based legal framework, with requirements that vary by system, role, and use.

Review state
Reviewed in POC
Freshness
Current
Version
2
  • EU AI Act
  • European Union AI Act

Remember it this wayThe obligation follows the role, risk, use, and applicable date.

In plain language

The regulation does not treat all AI alike. It prohibits some practices, creates requirements for certain higher-risk uses, and assigns duties across providers, deployers, importers, distributors, and other actors.

Why it matters

Organizations may be affected by where systems and people operate, which role the organization plays, and how an AI system is used—not only where a vendor is headquartered.

Example

A company evaluating an AI-supported employment process determines its legal role, system classification, documentation duties, human-oversight needs, and applicable dates.

Common misconception

The EU AI Act is not one immediate rule applied identically to every AI feature. Scope, classification, role, exceptions, and phased applicability require current legal review.

Related terms

Sources

Learn more

  • Consult the current official EU AI Act text and implementation guidance; use [[ai-governance|AI Governance]] to assign ownership.

Public history

45 recorded events · 45 public summaries

  1. A potential shared concept was discussed and selected for initial glossary drafting.

  2. The captured candidate received a complete initial draft and entered section-level human review.

  3. Radar reviewed the initial definition draft for human consideration.

  4. Radar reviewed the initial plain-language-explanation draft for human consideration.

  5. Radar reviewed the initial why-it-matters draft for human consideration.

  6. Radar reviewed the initial example draft for human consideration.

  7. Radar reviewed the initial common-misconception draft for human consideration.

  8. Radar reviewed the initial remember-it-this-way draft for human consideration.

  9. Radar reviewed the initial related-terms draft for human consideration.

  10. Radar reviewed the initial sources draft for human consideration.

  11. Radar reviewed the initial learn-more draft for human consideration.

  12. A proposal was opened for section-level human review while preserving the current version.

  13. A human reviewer opened a proposed revision while preserving the current approved or captured version.

  14. definition approved by a human reviewer.

  15. plain-language-explanation approved by a human reviewer.

  16. why-it-matters approved by a human reviewer.

  17. example approved by a human reviewer.

  18. common-misconception approved by a human reviewer.

  19. remember-it-this-way approved by a human reviewer.

  20. related-terms approved by a human reviewer.

  21. sources returned for revision.

  22. learn-more approved by a human reviewer.

  23. Requested wording was prepared without changing approved or existing sections.

  24. Radar reviewed the pending sources section for human consideration.

  25. Radar must rereview the complete eu-ai-act term after an accepted text change.

  26. Radar must rereview the complete eu-ai-act term after an accepted text change.

  27. Radar must rereview the complete eu-ai-act term after an accepted text change.

  28. Radar must rereview the complete eu-ai-act term after an accepted text change.

  29. Radar must rereview the complete eu-ai-act term after an accepted text change.

  30. Radar must rereview the complete eu-ai-act term after an accepted text change.

  31. Radar must rereview the complete eu-ai-act term after an accepted text change.

  32. Radar must rereview the complete eu-ai-act term after an accepted text change.

  33. Radar must rereview the complete eu-ai-act term after an accepted text change.

  34. sources approved by a human reviewer.

  35. sources approved wording became the current section text.

  36. All section gates are approved; content version 2 is now a fully approved term.

  37. Radar rereviewed the human-approved definition wording for this exact version.

  38. Radar rereviewed the human-approved plain-language-explanation wording for this exact version.

  39. Radar rereviewed the human-approved why-it-matters wording for this exact version.

  40. Radar rereviewed the human-approved example wording for this exact version.

  41. Radar rereviewed the human-approved common-misconception wording for this exact version.

  42. Radar rereviewed the human-approved remember-it-this-way wording for this exact version.

  43. Radar rereviewed the human-approved related-terms wording for this exact version.

  44. Radar rereviewed the human-approved sources wording for this exact version.

  45. Radar rereviewed the human-approved learn-more wording for this exact version.

Source: vault/Glossary/terms/eu-ai-act/term.md · sha256:71bdba41bf8831e8154507fa6f24b686302871a95c1d6262af4143cdb24476f0 · Release: rs-glossary-glossary-team-poc-0.5.5-2026-09-02