Skip to content
Get in touch

Reviewed in POC · content version 1

Review Evidence Selection

Your draft is bound to this exact source hash. If the term changes, the Review Desk will use a new storage key instead of silently attaching old decisions.

Definition

Evidence selection is the process of deciding which observations, records, sources, examples, or test results will be used to evaluate a claim or support a decision.
Decision for Definition

Plain-Language Explanation

A conclusion depends partly on what evidence is allowed into the analysis. Good selection seeks relevant, reliable, and sufficiently representative evidence, including material that could challenge the preferred answer.
Decision for Plain-Language Explanation

Why It Matters

Careful reasoning cannot rescue a distorted evidence set. Selection choices can hide failures, overrepresent convenient cases, or make a system appear safer and more capable than it is in real use.
Decision for Why It Matters

Example

A team evaluates an AI support tool using only short, well-structured questions written by its developers. It excludes long, ambiguous requests from actual customers. The resulting accuracy score describes the selected test set, not the full service environment.
Decision for Example

Common Misconception

More evidence is not automatically better evidence. Repeated copies of one claim do not create independent support, and a large convenient sample can still omit the people, conditions, or counterexamples that matter.
Decision for Common Misconception

Remember It This Way

The evidence you choose sets the boundary of what you can conclude.
Decision for Remember It This Way

Related Terms

* [[confirmation-bias|Confirmation Bias]] * [[observation|Observation]] * [[independent-verification|Independent Verification]] * [[adversarial-review|Adversarial Review]]
Decision for Related Terms

Sources

* [NIST, “AI RMF Core: Measure”](https://airc.nist.gov/airmf-resources/airmf/5-sec-core/) — representative evaluation conditions, documented test sets, meaningful measurement, and consultation with affected actors. * [NIST, “Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework 1.0”](https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1) — context-dependent measurement, population differences, baselines, and risks in real-world settings.
Decision for Sources

Learn More

* [RS AI Learning Lab, “Designing Systems That Can Admit They Are Wrong”](../../../../modules/designing-systems-that-can-admit-they-are-wrong/module.md) * [RS AI Learning Lab, “When AI Starts Arguing Instead of Thinking”](../../../../modules/when-ai-starts-arguing-instead-of-thinking/module.md)
Decision for Learn More
Return to term

Not saved yet.