Skip to content
Get in touch
Selected colored examples enter an existing brain-shaped machine through a funnel while a hand adjusts it with a wrench. A tidy set of the same shapes exits the other side.
Reviewed visual · version 1

RS Glossary

Fine-Tuning

Fine-tuning is additional training applied to an existing model using selected examples or feedback to change its behavior for a task, domain, or response pattern.

Review state
Reviewed in POC
Freshness
Current
Version
2
  • Fine-Tuning
  • Fine Tuning

Remember it this wayFine-tuning changes the model; retrieval changes what the model can consult now.

In plain language

Instead of building a model from the beginning, a team starts with a pretrained model and adjusts some of its parameters using a narrower training process.

Why it matters

Fine-tuning can improve consistent behavior, but it creates data, evaluation, maintenance, cost, and version-management obligations that prompting or retrieval may avoid.

Example

A company fine-tunes a model on reviewed examples so it follows a specialized output format more consistently.

Common misconception

Fine-tuning is not the same as giving a model current documents to consult. Retrieval supplies information at use time; fine-tuning changes learned behavior.

Related terms

Sources

Learn more

  • Compare with [[retrieval-augmented-generation|Retrieval-Augmented Generation]] before choosing an adaptation method.

Public history

45 recorded events · 45 public summaries
  1. A potential shared concept was discussed and selected for initial glossary drafting.

  2. The captured candidate received a complete initial draft and entered section-level human review.

  3. Radar reviewed the initial definition draft for human consideration.

  4. Radar reviewed the initial plain-language-explanation draft for human consideration.

  5. Radar reviewed the initial why-it-matters draft for human consideration.

  6. Radar reviewed the initial example draft for human consideration.

  7. Radar reviewed the initial common-misconception draft for human consideration.

  8. Radar reviewed the initial remember-it-this-way draft for human consideration.

  9. Radar reviewed the initial related-terms draft for human consideration.

  10. Radar reviewed the initial sources draft for human consideration.

  11. Radar reviewed the initial learn-more draft for human consideration.

  12. A proposal was opened for section-level human review while preserving the current version.

  13. A human reviewer opened a proposed revision while preserving the current approved or captured version.

  14. definition approved by a human reviewer.

  15. plain-language-explanation approved by a human reviewer.

  16. why-it-matters approved by a human reviewer.

  17. example approved by a human reviewer.

  18. common-misconception approved by a human reviewer.

  19. remember-it-this-way approved by a human reviewer.

  20. related-terms approved by a human reviewer.

  21. sources returned for revision.

  22. learn-more approved by a human reviewer.

  23. Requested wording was prepared without changing approved or existing sections.

  24. Radar reviewed the pending sources section for human consideration.

  25. Radar must rereview the complete fine-tuning term after an accepted text change.

  26. Radar must rereview the complete fine-tuning term after an accepted text change.

  27. Radar must rereview the complete fine-tuning term after an accepted text change.

  28. Radar must rereview the complete fine-tuning term after an accepted text change.

  29. Radar must rereview the complete fine-tuning term after an accepted text change.

  30. Radar must rereview the complete fine-tuning term after an accepted text change.

  31. Radar must rereview the complete fine-tuning term after an accepted text change.

  32. Radar must rereview the complete fine-tuning term after an accepted text change.

  33. Radar must rereview the complete fine-tuning term after an accepted text change.

  34. sources approved by a human reviewer.

  35. sources approved wording became the current section text.

  36. All section gates are approved; content version 2 is now a fully approved term.

  37. Radar rereviewed the human-approved definition wording for this exact version.

  38. Radar rereviewed the human-approved plain-language-explanation wording for this exact version.

  39. Radar rereviewed the human-approved why-it-matters wording for this exact version.

  40. Radar rereviewed the human-approved example wording for this exact version.

  41. Radar rereviewed the human-approved common-misconception wording for this exact version.

  42. Radar rereviewed the human-approved remember-it-this-way wording for this exact version.

  43. Radar rereviewed the human-approved related-terms wording for this exact version.

  44. Radar rereviewed the human-approved sources wording for this exact version.

  45. Radar rereviewed the human-approved learn-more wording for this exact version.

Source: vault/Glossary/terms/fine-tuning/term.md · sha256:d479f9ce81a191e4db8da895d0c18b42ec510161fac2f42f86c5be8412091b40 · Release: rs-glossary-glossary-team-poc-0.5.5-2026-09-02