Skip to content
Get in touch
A person fits a large puzzle piece beside a robot. A dashed loop below connects a lightbulb, a checked puzzle piece under a magnifying glass, and a wrench.
Reviewed visual · version 1

RS Glossary

Prompt Engineering

Prompt engineering is the deliberate design, testing, and revision of instructions and context used to guide an AI system toward a useful result.

Review state
Reviewed in POC
Freshness
Current
Version
2
  • Prompt Engineering

Remember it this wayDesign the request, test the result, and repair the conversation.

In plain language

People improve a request by clarifying the task, supplying relevant context, setting boundaries, showing examples, and checking the response. It is an iterative practice rather than a search for one magic phrase.

Why it matters

Clear inputs reduce avoidable ambiguity, but prompting cannot repair missing data, unsuitable models, broken workflows, or absent human review.

Example

A team tests several versions of a document-summary prompt, compares results against a checklist, and records which context and constraints improve reliability.

Common misconception

Prompt engineering is not a guarantee of correctness and is not the whole discipline of working effectively with AI.

Related terms

Sources

Learn more

  • Use the Learning Lab's conversation-engineering material with [[prompt|Prompt]] and [[human-review|Human Review]].

Public history

45 recorded events · 45 public summaries

  1. A potential shared concept was discussed and selected for initial glossary drafting.

  2. The captured candidate received a complete initial draft and entered section-level human review.

  3. Radar reviewed the initial definition draft for human consideration.

  4. Radar reviewed the initial plain-language-explanation draft for human consideration.

  5. Radar reviewed the initial why-it-matters draft for human consideration.

  6. Radar reviewed the initial example draft for human consideration.

  7. Radar reviewed the initial common-misconception draft for human consideration.

  8. Radar reviewed the initial remember-it-this-way draft for human consideration.

  9. Radar reviewed the initial related-terms draft for human consideration.

  10. Radar reviewed the initial sources draft for human consideration.

  11. Radar reviewed the initial learn-more draft for human consideration.

  12. A proposal was opened for section-level human review while preserving the current version.

  13. A human reviewer opened a proposed revision while preserving the current approved or captured version.

  14. definition approved by a human reviewer.

  15. plain-language-explanation approved by a human reviewer.

  16. why-it-matters approved by a human reviewer.

  17. example approved by a human reviewer.

  18. common-misconception approved by a human reviewer.

  19. remember-it-this-way approved by a human reviewer.

  20. related-terms approved by a human reviewer.

  21. sources returned for revision.

  22. learn-more approved by a human reviewer.

  23. Requested wording was prepared without changing approved or existing sections.

  24. Radar reviewed the pending sources section for human consideration.

  25. Radar must rereview the complete prompt-engineering term after an accepted text change.

  26. Radar must rereview the complete prompt-engineering term after an accepted text change.

  27. Radar must rereview the complete prompt-engineering term after an accepted text change.

  28. Radar must rereview the complete prompt-engineering term after an accepted text change.

  29. Radar must rereview the complete prompt-engineering term after an accepted text change.

  30. Radar must rereview the complete prompt-engineering term after an accepted text change.

  31. Radar must rereview the complete prompt-engineering term after an accepted text change.

  32. Radar must rereview the complete prompt-engineering term after an accepted text change.

  33. Radar must rereview the complete prompt-engineering term after an accepted text change.

  34. sources approved by a human reviewer.

  35. sources approved wording became the current section text.

  36. All section gates are approved; content version 2 is now a fully approved term.

  37. Radar rereviewed the human-approved definition wording for this exact version.

  38. Radar rereviewed the human-approved plain-language-explanation wording for this exact version.

  39. Radar rereviewed the human-approved why-it-matters wording for this exact version.

  40. Radar rereviewed the human-approved example wording for this exact version.

  41. Radar rereviewed the human-approved common-misconception wording for this exact version.

  42. Radar rereviewed the human-approved remember-it-this-way wording for this exact version.

  43. Radar rereviewed the human-approved related-terms wording for this exact version.

  44. Radar rereviewed the human-approved sources wording for this exact version.

  45. Radar rereviewed the human-approved learn-more wording for this exact version.

Source: vault/Glossary/terms/prompt-engineering/term.md · sha256:c0d0d4ca0c41b29988ca0e6bafcfe7c567cef92d6a2d03afd3bf892953198487 · Release: rs-glossary-glossary-team-poc-0.5.5-2026-09-02