RS Glossary
Sanitized Information
Sanitized information has been changed to remove or replace identifying, confidential, sensitive, or unnecessary details before it is shared.
Sanitization can reduce risk, but it does not automatically make information anonymous, authorized, or safe.
- Review state
- Reviewed in POC
- Freshness
- Current
- Version
- 2
- sanitized-information
Remember it this wayKeep the pattern; remove the person.
In plain language
Keep the structure needed for the task, but replace real names, identifiers, dates, locations, and private details with fictional or generalized information.
Why it matters
Learners often need realistic examples without exposing real people or organizations.
A sanitized example preserves the learning need while removing details that do not belong in the tool.
Example
Replace a real client name, account number, location, and exact dates with fictional values before using a scenario for training.
Common misconception
Removing a name does not necessarily make information safe. Other details can identify a person or organization when they are distinctive or combined with outside information.
Related terms
Sources
- NIST IR 8053, "De-Identification of Personal Information"de-identification methods, privacy-risk reduction, and the possibility of re-identification.
- NIST SP 800-122, "Guide to Protecting the Confidentiality of Personally Identifiable Information"identifying PII and selecting safeguards based on confidentiality impact.
Learn more
Public history
27 recorded events · 27 public summaries
Existing glossary content was moved into the unified source-of-truth structure without changing its learner-facing body.
A captured draft entered section-level human review without changing its existing wording.
Missing required wording was proposed while preserving the captured draft.
Radar reviewed the definition section for human consideration.
Radar reviewed the plain-language-explanation section for human consideration.
Radar reviewed the why-it-matters section for human consideration.
Radar reviewed the example section for human consideration.
Radar reviewed the common-misconception section for human consideration.
Radar reviewed the remember-it-this-way section for human consideration.
Radar reviewed the related-terms section for human consideration.
Radar reviewed the sources section for human consideration.
Radar reviewed the learn-more section for human consideration.
definition approved by a human reviewer.
plain-language-explanation approved by a human reviewer.
why-it-matters approved by a human reviewer.
example approved by a human reviewer.
common-misconception approved by a human reviewer.
remember-it-this-way approved by a human reviewer.
related-terms approved by a human reviewer.
sources approved by a human reviewer.
learn-more approved by a human reviewer.
plain-language-explanation approved wording became the current section text.
common-misconception approved wording became the current section text.
remember-it-this-way approved wording became the current section text.
sources approved wording became the current section text.
learn-more approved wording became the current section text.
All section gates are approved; content version 2 is now a fully approved term.
Source: vault/Glossary/terms/sanitized-information/term.md · sha256:2ed88885001a0d94ea3af81cac60feebfcae9b3374fa8a7475adf86699bd1bd1 · Release: rs-glossary-glossary-team-poc-0.5.5-2026-09-02