Sources, measures, and limits
Evidence
Evidence constrains the story. It does not choose the response.
Observed claims stay separate from interpretations. Measurements retain their unit, denominator, method, period, and uncertainty where available.
Claim status
Supported directly grounded in the listed sources.
Contested grounded, but meaning or interpretation requires visible disagreement.
Interpretive a bounded synthesis used by this world, not a measured fact.
Efficiency relates achieved results to resources used; effectiveness concerns whether planned activities and results are achieved. A process can improve one without proving the other.
- Period
- 2015–2021
- Location
- global
- Jurisdiction
- international standards and evaluation practice
- Affected parties
- decision makers, workers, users, communities
UncertaintyThese established definitions do not select which result, purpose, stakeholder, or resource boundary should govern a specific decision.
CounterinterpretationSome evaluation practices assess efficiency across outcomes and impacts rather than direct output alone.
Cultural contextWhat counts as a resource, result, or justified cost can differ across institutions and affected groups.
An output is a direct product or service of activity; an outcome is a change that follows for people, institutions, or conditions. Output volume does not by itself establish outcome quality.
- Period
- 2021
- Location
- global application
- Jurisdiction
- OECD evaluation framework
- Affected parties
- program participants, service users, funders, implementing workers
UncertaintyCausal attribution from an output to an outcome may be difficult, and organizations use results-chain terms with some variation.
CounterinterpretationIn tightly controlled processes, a well-specified output may serve as a practical proxy for an outcome, but the proxy should be declared.
Cultural contextOfficial results frameworks can privilege outcomes that institutions can count over changes affected groups consider important.
Under the EU Waste Framework Directive, a production residue may qualify as a by-product only under specified conditions; whether material is legally waste, a by-product, or no longer waste is context- and jurisdiction-dependent.
- Period
- 2008-present
- Location
- EU member states
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Affected parties
- producers, regulators, waste holders, recyclers, communities
UncertaintyThis legal distinction does not apply universally outside the European Union and does not by itself measure environmental or social consequence.
CounterinterpretationEveryday and operational uses of “byproduct” are broader than the EU legal category.
Cultural contextClassification changes compliance duties, market access, handling costs, and who bears risk.
An estimated 62 million tonnes of e-waste were generated globally in 2022, and 22.3 percent was documented as formally collected and recycled in an environmentally sound manner.
62 million tonnesDenominator: global e-waste generatedMethod: UNITAR and ITU global e-waste statistical model
22.3 percentDenominator: global e-waste generated that was documented as formally collected and recycledMethod: UNITAR and ITU global e-waste statistical model
- Period
- 2022
- Location
- worldwide
- Jurisdiction
- global
- Affected parties
- device users, repair workers, recycling workers, communities, ecosystems
UncertaintyThe figures are global statistical estimates; documented formal collection is not the same as complete material recovery or safe handling of every fraction.
CounterinterpretationThe undocumented share includes multiple destinations and should not be described as one uniform informal or disposal pathway.
Cultural contextGlobal totals conceal large regional differences in consumption, trade, collection infrastructure, livelihoods, and exposure.
The Global E-waste Monitor estimated that 2022 e-waste contained USD 91 billion in metals, while its economic assessment reported recovered-metal and avoided-emission benefits alongside treatment and externalized costs, for an overall annual impact of negative USD 37 billion.
91 billion USDDenominator: estimated metals contained in global e-waste generatedMethod: Global E-waste Monitor economic assessment
-37 billion USD per yearDenominator: modelled overall economic impact of global e-waste managementMethod: Benefits less treatment and externalized costs in the report's monetary model
- Period
- 2022
- Location
- worldwide
- Jurisdiction
- global economic assessment
- Affected parties
- producers, recyclers, workers, communities, ecosystems
UncertaintyThese are monetized global estimates using modelling choices; their categories should not replace the distinct physical, health, labor, or ecological measures beneath them.
CounterinterpretationMaterial value does not mean all material is technically, economically, or safely recoverable, and a monetized externality is not the full lived consequence.
Cultural contextCosts and benefits are distributed unevenly among producers, consumers, formal and informal workers, communities, and future generations.
E-waste afterlives include both livelihoods and hazards: the ILO estimates millions of jobs across repair, collection, recycling, and recovery, while WHO identifies serious exposure risks in unsafe informal recycling conditions.
6.32 million jobsDenominator: modelled global employment in e-waste activitiesMethod: ILO input-output framework linked to labor-force and UNITAR e-waste data
- Period
- 2022–2025
- Location
- worldwide
- Jurisdiction
- global
- Affected parties
- repair workers, collection workers, recycling workers, families, communities
UncertaintyGlobal employment is modelled from input-output and labor data, and “informal” covers heterogeneous work, capability, bargaining power, safety, and regulation.
CounterinterpretationTreating all informal activity as only harm can erase livelihoods and expertise; treating it only as value recovery can hide exposure and unequal conditions.
Cultural contextRepair and recovery systems differ sharply by income, gender, region, infrastructure, law, and worker organization.
EU rules applying from June 2025 require covered smartphones and tablets to meet durability and repairability requirements, including key spare-parts availability for seven years after model sales end and operating-system updates for at least five years after the last unit is placed on the market.
- Period
- 2025-present
- Location
- EU market
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Affected parties
- users, repairers, manufacturers, resellers
UncertaintyThese are minimum requirements for covered products placed on the EU market; actual service, repair cost, parts quality, and useful life vary.
CounterinterpretationRegulatory availability does not guarantee that every repair is affordable, chosen, technically successful, or environmentally preferable.
Cultural contextRepair options depend on jurisdiction, access to tools and parts, data rights, skill, income, and local service capacity.
Virtual services depend on physical infrastructure: the IEA estimated data centres used about 415 terawatt-hours of electricity in 2024, around 1.5 percent of global electricity consumption, with servers, storage, networking, cooling, and resilience equipment contributing differently.
415 terawatt-hoursDenominator: estimated global data-centre electricity consumptionMethod: IEA Energy and AI analysis
1.5 percentDenominator: global electricity consumptionMethod: IEA Energy and AI analysis
- Period
- 2024
- Location
- worldwide with regional concentration
- Jurisdiction
- global energy assessment
- Affected parties
- service users, data-centre workers, utilities, host communities, ecosystems
UncertaintyData-centre electricity estimates and future scenarios carry substantial uncertainty and vary greatly by facility, service, location, grid, and time.
CounterinterpretationA global percentage can appear modest while geographically concentrated facilities can have large local electricity and infrastructure effects.
Cultural contextThe location of infrastructure, energy supply, water and cooling conditions, data governance, and who receives the service shape distributional consequences.
Rare use does not prove waste: data-centre backup power and uninterruptible-power systems may be seldom activated yet remain necessary for a declared reliability purpose.
- Period
- 2024
- Location
- data centres worldwide
- Jurisdiction
- operational illustration grounded in global energy analysis
- Affected parties
- service users, operators, utilities, host communities
UncertaintyWhether a particular reserve is proportionate requires service requirements, failure risk, alternatives, cost, and consequence data.
CounterinterpretationA reserve can still be excessive or poorly designed; the claim is only that utilization rate alone is insufficient to classify it as waste.
Cultural contextReliability priorities and the consequences of failure differ across hospitals, public services, businesses, households, and regions.
UNEP estimated 1.05 billion tonnes of food waste at retail, food-service, and household levels in 2022, equivalent to 19 percent of food available to consumers; households accounted for 60 percent of the estimate.
1.05 billion tonnesDenominator: food waste at retail, food-service, and household levelsMethod: UNEP Food Waste Index global estimate
19 percentDenominator: food available to consumersMethod: UNEP Food Waste Index global estimate
- Period
- 2022
- Location
- worldwide
- Jurisdiction
- global food-waste measurement
- Affected parties
- households, food-service workers, retailers, farmers, communities, ecosystems
UncertaintyThe global total includes inedible parts and is not a bread-specific estimate; data quality and coverage differ across countries and sectors.
CounterinterpretationFood loss before retail is measured separately, so this claim should not stand for the entire food supply chain.
Cultural contextEdibility, preparation, portioning, storage, redistribution, and household practice vary across places and cultures.
Environmental externalities are spill-over consequences not fully reflected in private choices or prices, and full cost internalization is often difficult and incomplete.
- Period
- 2025
- Location
- OECD and partner-country policy contexts
- Jurisdiction
- OECD policy analysis
- Affected parties
- producers, consumers, taxpayers, workers, communities, ecosystems
UncertaintyMonetary valuation depends on modelling, jurisdiction, available data, ethical choices, and whose losses receive a price.
CounterinterpretationA consequence can be important even when monetization is unavailable or inappropriate.
Cultural contextInstitutions with authority to define and price external costs can privilege some harms, timescales, and affected parties over others.
In this world, “waste is relational” is an operational lens: observed consequences remain fixed, while purpose changes designation and boundary changes accounting visibility.
- Period
- contemporary
- Location
- composite global smartphone scenario
- Jurisdiction
- operational model for this visual world
- Affected parties
- decision makers, users, workers, communities, ecosystems
UncertaintyThe instrument is a teaching model, not a universal legal definition or predictive life-cycle assessment.
CounterinterpretationSome hazardous materials require firm handling duties regardless of a visitor's purpose or preferred ledger.
Cultural contextAuthority to name waste and draw boundaries is distributed unequally; classification can transfer duties, value, and burden.